Please reed my message and see if I am wrong or irrational. If they are "preparing for contact" I am Marilyn Monroe.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Christie Carter <carter.christie@rocketmail.com>
To: "rationalufology@yahoogroups.com" <rationalufology@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 12:46 AM
Subject: [RationalUFOLOGY] Dr. Salla wants just YES men and women.
From: Christie Carter <carter.christie@rocketmail.com>
To: "rationalufology@yahoogroups.com" <rationalufology@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 12:46 AM
Subject: [RationalUFOLOGY] Dr. Salla wants just YES men and women.
Debunking and trolls are not permitted on the p4c forum. You have been removed from the membership list.
Listowner
--- In prepare4contact@yahoogroups.com, Christie Carter <carter.christie@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Anton, first of all let me tell you that is impossible to find a difference between fiction and fact in all you write below.Â
> All those books are nothing but fiction: perhaps some of these sold well in the New Age social environment. I AM TALKING ABOUT SCIENCE, NOT FICTION.
>
> Now let us see those evidences you mentioned:Â
>
> Evidence is everywhere from:
>
> 1. worldwide religious and mythological accounts commonly describing ancient encounters with advanced beings
>
> (mythology is no evidence of course.)
>
> 2. anomalous archaeological sites and artifacts indicating past use of superior technology
>
> Tell me one of those sites and artifacts recognized by serious scientists and universities as evidences of a superior, not human technology.Define what you meant by ANOMALOUS archeological sites.
>
> 3. over a century’s worth of eyewitness sightings of UFOs
>
> In your own words is the recognition SIGHTINGS of UNIDENTIFIED flying objects. (more than 90 % are identifies as natural phenomenon nor human made artifacts.)
>
> 4. hundreds of physical trace samples recovered from UFO landing sites
>
> What exactly you mean by physical trace samples: Refer me please to some serious scientific source for EVIDENCES about this.Â
>
> 5. government documents and whistleblowers acknowledging the existence of extraterrestrials
>
> Totally unreliable sources of course. More important, these don not prove the existence of Extraterrestrials at all.
>
> 6. thousands of abduction cases that include multiple witnesses, memories recalled without hypnosis
> Even if the abductions were real, this doesn't mean that were performed by extraterrestrials.Â
>
> 7. undisputable physical and medical evidence confirming these accounts
>
> Not such thing: physical and medical evidences could perhaps confirm the experience of an abduction, but never as an extraterrestrial activity.
>
>
>
>
Listowner
--- In prepare4contact@yahoogroups.com, Christie Carter <carter.christie@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Anton, first of all let me tell you that is impossible to find a difference between fiction and fact in all you write below.Â
> All those books are nothing but fiction: perhaps some of these sold well in the New Age social environment. I AM TALKING ABOUT SCIENCE, NOT FICTION.
>
> Now let us see those evidences you mentioned:Â
>
> Evidence is everywhere from:
>
> 1. worldwide religious and mythological accounts commonly describing ancient encounters with advanced beings
>
> (mythology is no evidence of course.)
>
> 2. anomalous archaeological sites and artifacts indicating past use of superior technology
>
> Tell me one of those sites and artifacts recognized by serious scientists and universities as evidences of a superior, not human technology.Define what you meant by ANOMALOUS archeological sites.
>
> 3. over a century’s worth of eyewitness sightings of UFOs
>
> In your own words is the recognition SIGHTINGS of UNIDENTIFIED flying objects. (more than 90 % are identifies as natural phenomenon nor human made artifacts.)
>
> 4. hundreds of physical trace samples recovered from UFO landing sites
>
> What exactly you mean by physical trace samples: Refer me please to some serious scientific source for EVIDENCES about this.Â
>
> 5. government documents and whistleblowers acknowledging the existence of extraterrestrials
>
> Totally unreliable sources of course. More important, these don not prove the existence of Extraterrestrials at all.
>
> 6. thousands of abduction cases that include multiple witnesses, memories recalled without hypnosis
> Even if the abductions were real, this doesn't mean that were performed by extraterrestrials.Â
>
> 7. undisputable physical and medical evidence confirming these accounts
>
> Not such thing: physical and medical evidences could perhaps confirm the experience of an abduction, but never as an extraterrestrial activity.
>
>
>
>
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
