Saturday, August 4, 2012

Fwd: The Truth about Extraterrestrial Abductions.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <forbidden-reports@nyms.net>
Date: Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 12:51 AM
Subject: The Truth about Extraterrestrial Abductions.
To: fso2604@gmail.com


The Extraterrestrial Abduction Experience.

Close Extraterrestrial Encounter Syndrome (CEES) is an Adjustment Disorder Not Otherwise Specified .A reaction to a close extraterrestrial encounter (CEE), remembered or repressed into the unconscious, which substantially alters patterns of daily living or social relationships in a mildly disorienting or unsettling way, and has four or more of the following 20 associated symptoms. These symptoms may include:
Repeated anxiety/unexplained restlessness after an anomalous event, (such as one involving nocturnal lights, viewing a UFO, a sense of a foreign presence in the house, or an unexplained detour from one's ordinary driving route);
Phobic reaction to phenomena consciously or unconsciously associated with a CEE, (such as an accurate sketch of an extraterrestrial face);
Repeated sleep disturbances or nightmares with UFO/ET themes;
Obsessional "Dreams" or daytime thinking about UFOs, ETs or CEES;
Compulsive behavior (e.g., reading) concerning the UFO topic;
Unexplained moodiness/irritability after an anomalous UFO/encounter incident
Preoccupation with body symptoms/marks associated with a CEE (such as tiny scoop marks, or laser scars which don't bleed or hurt and which heal very quickly, or inexplicable bruises noted upon wakening consistent with an extraterrestrial hand grip, or episodic ringing in one ear, or other episodic resonance vibrations felt in a particular body site, such as the upper nasal sinus cavity or the occipital lobe region of the brain);
Experiencing an unexplainable, substantial period of "missing time" following an anomalous incident, (such as being paced at night by a "car" with a single powerful headlight, or sitting down after dinner to watch television, immediately noticing an unusual pattern on the screen, and "waking up" at 9:00 the next morning unable to remember having watched TV or going to bed, etc.);
The sudden, unexplained onset of feelings of social non-ordinariness (i.e., that one is out of sync with the world, or that the world no longer seems as it used to);
Cosmic awareness (thinking about the Earth as a living whole, instead of confining one's perspective to neighborhood or town or country; or thinking about the Earth as just one among many inhabited planets) which enters with unusual frequency into one's daytime thinking;
Suddenly feeling an affinity for CEE experiencers one reads about or hears interviewed on television, or feeling a strong attraction to extraterrestrials as somehow familiar;
A sense of receiving telepathic messages or repeated gifted intuitions, presumably from an extraterrestrial source;
A sense of one's mindspace being episodically entered into and shared with an extraterrestrial being;
The onset of or marked increase in, psychic/ESP ability, (such as clairvoyance, telepathy, precognition, or telekinesis);
Onset of attraction for a spiritually or religious practice based on the in-dwelling of the Supreme Source in all nature, and resultant reverence for all lifeforms as related;
Sense of longing for the primary-contact Extraterrestrial one has dealt with during one or more Encounters;
An obsessive sense of having a mission (clear, vague or unconscious) derived from the CEE, and related to the extraterrestrials' messages;
A sense of strong "pull" to travel to a specific area, either with an intuition of an impending close encounter there, or for an unknown reason, (which turns out to be a CEE);
Having an extraterrestrial perspective to the Earth's situation, or feeling a genetic heritage partially derived from extraterrestrial sources, or having a sense of having come from off-planet, or having somehow had an extraterrestrial as one parent;
Sense of one's destiny as off-planet, or feeling a "pull" to go "home" to an extraterrestrial planet one was shown by the ET's, or to "rejoin fellow" extraterrestrials elsewhere in the galaxy.
Then, there are those experiencers who are suffering from major symptoms of a Complicated Close Extraterrestrial Encounter Syndrome (CEES). Most often this is because they are still dealing with residual emotions from an earlier, severe, human-caused trauma, for which they have not yet completed a successful course of psychotherapy. In such instances, the extraterrestrial visitations cause an abreactive exacerbation of previous, human-caused Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Other preexisting disorders which predispose an experiencer to develop major symptoms after an encounter are: Dissociative Identity Disorder, Borderline Personality Syndrome, severe Histrionic or severe Dependent Personality disorder. For such dually-challenged persons the therapist will need to consider longer-term psychotherapy.
Such therapy will need to deal with both the human-caused traumatic issues and the emotional exacerbation and turmoil resulting from extraterrestrial visitations. Special care will be needed to keep distinct the issues stemming from the human-caused trauma, and those issues stemming from the extraterrestrial contact itself. It cannot be expected that the experiencer who has had previous human trauma will initially be able to keep the two events separate. In fact, in my research experience, such experiencers almost always confuse the feelings coming from their extraterrestrial encounter with the residual feelings from their human trauma.
And this is to be expected. The reason such confounding of close encounter feelings with feelings from human trauma occurs is because the human trauma is invariable extremely intense, catastrophically unexpected, out-of-the-norm, and extremely intimate. The unresolved human traumata most likely to cause flashback emotions after a close encounter are: childhood sexual molestation, childhood or adult rape, or childhood ritual (Satanic) cultic abuse, (usually involving sexual molestation and torture). Such human traumata leave the victim with deep feelings of being intruded upon intimately by an unwanted other person, feelings of being overpowered in a frightening way, feelings of loss of the usual protective boundaries between what is personal and what is socially shared, and feeling of loss of distinction between where self ends and where another person begins (intimate invasion).
Because extraterrestrial encounters often involve the sudden appearance of one or more extraterrestrials without warning in an expected location, such as one's bedroom at night, their appearance can feel, at first, like an invasion. the extraterrestrials' use of mental telepathy, and their facility for reading one's thoughts and the contents of one's mind, can feel, to the previously traumatized person, like an old, familiar, and unwelcome intrusion into what is in our culture one's private space. Here we have the clash of two cultures, polar opposite in their assumptions. In human culture, (Western modern industrial culture, anyway) the assumption is that one's thoughts and living space are private, because individualism is prized. In extraterrestrial cultures researched thus far, it appears that living space and thoughts are inevitably shared, because of the automatic, two-way nature of the mutual telepathic ability of all members of their society. they live in a shared min

 d-field "commons".
There are other aspects of some close encounters which may also cause traumatic flashbacks. Sometimes an extraterrestrial will cloak him/herself (yes, they have gender) by imposing on the mind of the experiencer the borrowed appearance of a familiar family figure, so that the experiencer believes (and remembers) that it was Dad, or Uncle Henry, or Grandma that was actually in the bedroom the night they woke up with a presence in the room. If that close encounter also includes a scientific-medical exam, with the experiencer on her back, paralyzed or held in place by force-field ankle or wrist restraints, and if palpation of the pelvic or buttocks areas, or a gynecological procedure is part of the procedures, and the experiencer has only sketchy recall of the encounter, their memory may put the fragments remembered together and come up with the pseudo-memory that Dad, or Uncle Henry, or Grandma pinned them down in their bedroom and molested them. I have discovered at least five

  instances of such pseudo-incest memories in an 86-case research sample, and Hard psychiatrist John Mack reports more.
Then, there are those minority of cases, perhaps 5%, of persons who are the victims of pseudo-Alien abductions. These are staged by human Military/Intelligence "Special Operations" personnel to extract information or test exotic technology, and may include drugging, narco-hypnotism, psychological and physical abuse, interrogations, threats, rape, or torture, in exotic unfamiliar settings, with bizarre pseudo-"Aliens" (costumed Special Forces) present. The federal Department of Health and Human Services has been collecting reports from these victims.
Differential diagnosis of CEES from schizophrenia is relatively straightforward. Genuine experiencers do not have bizarre, grandiose, somatic, religious, nihilistic or persecutory delusions, (although the clinician must distinguish such report as telepathic communication by ETs from schizophrenia thought-insertion delusions.) Likewise, schizophrenic auditory hallucinations, where "the voices" criticize or command, must be distinguished from audible-seeming ET telepathic communication. And genuine experiencers are not incoherent, nor locked into illogical thinking or loose associations, as schizophrenics so often are. Also, experiencers' affect is anything but blunt or flat. Nor is their behavior grossly disorganized, as the schizophrenic's so often is.
Borderline Personality Disorder, as well as Factitious Disorder with Psychological Symptoms, provide differential diagnosis challenges, because many attention-seeking Borderlines and Factitious Disordered are now hopping on the "abductee-victim" bandwagon. Further, they have been exposed to enough media or support-group data to cleverly mimic experiencers. But persons who have had genuine encounters generally lack the marked mood-shifting, stubborn anger, history of intensely unstable relationships, gnawing identity disturbance, impulsivity patterns and chronic acting-out to enliven an empty life, which are the hallmarks of Borderlines.
Likewise, the Factitious-Disordered person's chaotic array of symptoms and stubborn clinging to "victim" status do differentiate them from the generally well-functioning experiencer, who genuinely wants to understand their experiences and come to feel resolved.
The differentiation of Delusional Disorder, Paranoid Type from CEES is more exacting, because a Delusional could, and sometimes does, have a single-topic delusion of extraterrestrial visitation, and otherwise be functional. However, the characteristically-disproportional, consuming paranoia of the Delusional is quite different than the sometimes-afraid reaction of some experiencers. Delusionals are refractory to reality-based educative counseling, while experiencers are able to master their misgivings and uncertainties about their encounters.
Frontal-Lobe Epilepsy may produce transient organic hallucinations, which can infrequently include "seeing" extraterrestrials. But the emotional liability, impulsiveness, intellectual rigidity or social disconnectedness often also seen in these organic personality syndromes distinguishes them from genuine victims who are usually psychologically indistinguishable from the general population.



--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

Extraterrestrials or Demonic Legions?



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <forbidden-reports@nyms.net>
Date: Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:30 PM
Subject: Demons or Extraterrestrials?
To: sadhanusari@gmail.com


The demonic legions masked as Extraterrestrial visitors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glvgAvlwA9c&feature=player_detailpage



--
Blog

http://ufotabloid.blogspot.com/


FOUR DISINFORMATION TACTICS.


Type 1: Provoke people with emotional and personal attacks
Disinformants seek to hijack the main topic and get people to divert their energies in to defending themselves or countering threats to their egoic identity.
Look out for words in capital letters trying to suggest higher intensity, and personal attacks covertly or overtly aimed at dirtying someone’s image. This is such an effective weapon of hiding the truth, because it has nothing to do with the truth itself, just encouraging people to fight amongst themselves.
The majority of individuals fall for the bait because many people still only consider their existence in terms of RenĂ© Descartes’ “Cogito ergo sum” (I think therefore I am), which today is an extremely limited perspective which allows the mind-made concept of ego to run amok.
Ascending to a more fruitful consciousness requires an acknowledgement of some or other spiritual paradigm to enable a meditative perspective of watching the watcher. i.e. How does one observe ones thoughts?
Solution: Detachment from our own ego is one of the most empowering skills to learn and makes this particular solution very easy, with no negative reaction: Just ignore the disinformant.
They want us to bite down on their bait of a emotional or personal attack and respond. Of course if someone responds to the first bait, then obviously they’re going to react to every bait trap set by this trolling tactic because now the ego-based individual is invested in counter-attacking or defending themselves, their reputation (a mind-made label of ego) or another egoic label of “being right”.
With this, we can say the individual becomes a victim of their own ego, and this is exploited by the disinformant. If we find ourselves in a petty or intellectual flame-war, we must understand it is our own choice to take or leave the bait.
Type 2: Introduce irrelevant & dead-end confusion
Whenever possible, the disinformant will introduce new facts or clues designed to conflict with opponent presentations — as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution to establishing the whole truth.
These may bring in new doubts, purposely fuel confusion, or send followers after red-herrings on a path of endless information which leads nowhere important. All the time spent investigating the dead-end, is time NOT spent investigating the critical topics.
Solution: Really the best thing we can do is try not expose ourself to such unreliable information in the first place, enacting due diligence on the sources we pursue.
It is notable to avoid places of high traffic such as popular forums and YouTube comments which are guaranteed to have lots of disinformants floating about, since they need to make an impact and reach as many people as possible to corrupt the search for factually correct information. Clearly if they can reach 1,000 truth seekers each hour, the disinformants intended damage is much higher than on a smaller website of 10 truth seeking visitors per hour.
So be very picky about what tips, recommendations and new information we choose to investigate. For example; if we were to invest 6 hours in a video series of documentaries, who would we listen to? Some unknown person on a forum whom we know nothing about? Or a completely random related video on YouTube with a good title? Or a trusted blogger with a track record? Or a well known published researcher? It’s our choice.
Type 3: Character assassination by association
Disinformation tactic number three associates opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “radical right-wing”, “loony left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “tin-hat wearers”, “sexual deviants”, “crazed lone wolf” and so forth.
These are all pre-judged labels which are collectively understood to be negative, tarnishing words and have been written by the mainstream media for decades. These pre-judged labels offer an easy opportunity for small-minded and judgemental individuals to reject new information upon hearing these trigger words.
By associating the negative label with somebody, that person’s character is effectively assassinated. i.e. Again it introduces doubt about the legitimacy of that individual’s message. Mainstream media use this character assassination frequently. If Fox news or any of the big six do cover controversial truths at all, it is usually to ridicule it and point people in the wrong direction.
This makes others shrink from supporting the same cause if they fear pre-judged labels, so avoid the issue to protect their ego and public image of what others might think. That is an instant victory for the disinformants and their name-calling threats work well at frightening people with a lot to lose. Since most sheeple get their one dimensional news through the filtered propaganda lens of mainstream media, the label is often enough.
Solution: If on a radio call-in show or being interviewed for a video and encounter this character assassination tactic, do not react or defend the provocative accusations, rather; dismiss them quickly and focus on getting out bullet-proof facts and arguments, even if it is off-track from what the TV or radio host wants to limit the conversation to. If it is a common internet troll, ignore them.
Once again, the success of this solution is greatly enhanced if one is learning the mindfulness of ego detachment. This is because when labels are thrown at us we understand them to be external labels of someone else’s opinion or viewpoint. The labels are not who we are, thus there is little or no reaction because we are not possessive about any personal labels.
Type 4: Argue the details of a different or less important subject.
The fourth and final tactic of disinformation in this article facilitates perpetual application of disinformation even when major truths fail to be suppressed and become well known (such as Iraq WMD’s, The USS Liberty false flag attack, The Lavon affair, etc). Disinformants simply ignore the massive glaring truth in question and try to shift the focus on to a lesser topic or an alternative subject altogether, in an effort to draw attention away from the critical truth which is out in the open.
Take for example a comment on an excellent documentary by Peter Oborne called “Inside Britain’s Israeli Lobby”. The main point of the documentary is that Israel has inordinate power over the British parliament. There are a number of comments (e.g. Leslie Golding on 19 November 2009 at 17:13) which illustrate this fourth type of disinformation, such as an argumentative hook on a less important and vaguely relevant topic, designed to misdirect people and waste their energy debating their superfluous points, and thus ignoring the more important message of the documentary.
The mainstream media invoke this tactic when a major point is no longer beyond doubt, the media spin machine will fall back to a lesser point and try to steer the debate and controversy on to a less important point, thereby taking the attention away from the more important proven truth. Of course the mainstream media’s preferred method is a media black-out, because attention of any kind risks giving a topic traction. What are you donig listening to the mainstream media anyway!
Solution: Ignore their points, and maintain a perspective and priority of issues. Reiterate the main points again and stay on course. It is also very effective to point out what the other person is doing. Something as simple as; “it looks like you are trying to change the subject to get away from the main issue” is remarkably powerful, because it illustrates what the disinformant is really attempting to do.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Mars visitor Andrew D Basiago Declares 2014 to start running for President.

(reliable sources suggested that Andy will finance his campaign jumping back in time and buying winning lotto tickets. )


Mars visitor Andrew D Basiago Declares 2014 to start running for ...

Part of DARPA's Project Pegasus as a young child and now a practicing
attorney Andrew D Basiago claims to be one of America's early timespace
explorers ...
<http://www.mateja.se/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6509:mars-visitor-andrew-d-basiago-declares-2014-to-start-running-for-presidency-&catid=41:open-minds&Itemid=83>

--
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalufology
http://ufoculture.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Olimpic UFO was just Goodyear.

Olympics UFO Was Definitely Our Blimp: Goodyear (PHOTOS)
Huffington Post
When a strange, milky-white object glided over the Olympics opening ceremony and was caught on video, there was chatter that this was the extraterrestrial visitation for which UFO researchers are constantly searching. Now we know the truth behind the ...